Rightwords... Prudent Conservatism

The Worldview of Secular Humanism (SH)

The author and Doctor of Divinity Tim LaHaye in his book “Mind Siege” gives a summary of the belief system and world view of Secular Humanism:

Belief in no God;

Belief in matter as eternal;

Belief in spontaneous generation;

Belief in man as an evolving animal;

Belief in no moral absolutes;

Belief in humanist man as the final authority;

Belief in the inner goodness and malleability of man;

Belief in no soul or spirit;

Belief in new sexual rights and responsibilities;

Belief in no eternal law;

Belief in humanist rule(which they call “democracy”)

Belief in a one-world socialist government;

Belief in no judgment or afterlife.

Derived from these beliefs are the following highly acceptable SH corollaries:

Abortion rights;

Homosexuality;

Pornography;

Prostitution;

Gambling;

No parents’ rights;

Infanticide and Euthanasia;

Drug use;

Full separation of church and state (never mentioned in the Constitution);

Removal of church and religion from the public space;

Open borders.

The US is well-along in allowing these practices and corollaries to become law and accepted custom. This has transformed the culture and the laws of the nation in unacceptable ways for those who knew the America of earlier times. Did anyone ever wonder why the congress continues to pass legislation that the people do not want? Is the congress captive to the above beliefs now? It would seems so, as over 55 congressmen have been identified as belonging to socialist organizations.

Is this the America we want?

Labels: Atheism. Christianity, Communists, The Leftwing

Labels: Atheism. Christianity, Secular Humanism

My comment field is not operating, so here is my reply.


Hello,

You stated, strong (Militaristic) atheists are wrong to attack the Christian religion and Christians and attempt to destroy them

Can you provide evidence of "militaristic" atheists attacking Christianity and Christians? It would seem this is a bogeyman.

And what "subversion of democratic principles" are secular humanists carrying out?

Is it equally wrong for Christians to do the same to non-Christians?

# posted by Robert : 4:21 PM Link

I will cite the authors I mentioned: Dawkins, Hitchins, and another two, David Limbaugh ("Persecution") and Charles Colson ("How Now Shall we Live"), plus numerous websites under the search word "Atheism", and finally the actions of the ACLU over the past twenty years.

About 50 to 60 congressmen have signed up to the Humanist Manifesto 2000, but have not publicized the fact at all. They have supported many leftist and atheistic bills, or provisions in bills that are against the majority wishes of the nation. That is wrong. Amnesty for Illegal immigrants is one such bill.

The Secular Humanists have many unacceptable provisions in their Manifesto or Manifestos (I, II, II, 2000) including: 1) Denial of religions; 2) Raising of all children by the government to ensure their proper education(!); 3) Bypassing the sovereignty of the US through the UN or similar org, and installing a SH international government ( read communist/socialist).

My personal approach is simple: live and let live, unless there is a threat from any sect to our nation, government, way of life, or my family. In that event, I will not be nice!

Labels: Atheism. Christianity

Belief and Non-Belief in God

The issue here is whether one believes in the Christian God, is agnostic about God’s existence, or else is atheistic (either strongly or weakly atheistic), and disbelieves in God.

It is the right of an individual to believe what he wants to believe. However, it is not his right to try to impose his beliefs onto others who have a different belief or non-belief system. Evangelicalism is wrong when it attempts to convert people by forceful persuasion or force of arms against their will and their current beliefs.

Thus, strong (Militaristic) atheists are wrong to attack the Christian religion and Christians and attempt to destroy them, just as Muslims are wrong to pursue dominance of Islam over the nations of the world, and secular humanists are wrong to try to impose their beliefs on the body politic through devious means such as subversion of democratic principles.

There is a right way and a wrong way to seek conversions. Ridiculing and attacking a religion is guaranteed to evoke a hostile response, as is use of force, or legal subterfuge.

A moral society has tolerance for religions and “non-religions” so long as they threaten no one else. Once, however, attacks begin, the center Christian majority must and will defend itself. It would seem that written attacks have indeed begun again today with Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchins, and other authors publishing books that take a very strong and hostile atheistic position. The rise of a Militant Atheism dedicated to converting the nation to its way of thinking is not welcome, and it is difficult to tolerate in this Judeo-Christian land that is 85% Christian.

Such Godlessness will be engaged on religious grounds.

The strongest question supporting belief in God I have ever read is:

"Why does the Universe, Life and Man exist at all?" --C.S Lewis

Labels: Atheism. Christianity

Labels: American Viruses

1. Focus their indignation on Muslims committing violent acts in the name of Islam, not on non-Muslims reporting on those acts.
2. Renounce definitively not just "terrorism," but any intention to replace the U.S. Constitution (or the constitutions of any non-Muslim state) with Sharia even by peaceful means.
3. Teach Muslims the imperative of coexisting peacefully as equals with non-Muslims on an indefinite basis.
4. Begin comprehensive international programs in mosques all over the world to teach against the ideas of violent jihad and Islamic supremacism.
5. Actively work with Western law enforcement officials to identify and apprehend jihadists within Western Muslim communities.

If Muslims do those five things, voila! "Islamophobia" will vanish.

Labels: Islam, Islamophobia

Labels: Iran, The Threat

Labels: Comments on the day