Sunday, July 17, 2005

 

Multiculturalism

What is Wrong with Assimilation?


The idea of multiculturalism in the US has been bubbling to the surface for years, to the point where the real meaning of such an anti-American stance has become much clearer. We are being told to believe that all cultures are equal, and that none should have preference over another. I would ask these dictators of our society in what way is the culture of a far off land that is still primitive anywhere near the equal to American culture? The sorry fact is that such cultures are not equal by any rational measure. So you say, well that is not what was meant exactly. So you meant that there were some cultures that are equal and others that are not?

In America, we have had for centuries whole sections of cities that were taken over by immigrants. These foreign communities served as a home for those who didn't speak acceptable English, and a haven where they could speak their native tongue and be understood for all of the necessities and social contacts of their lives. Gradually, however, successive generations of their families broke out from the communities and began to be assimilated into the common way of life in America. The older members who became rooted in the community, and perhaps never were able to learn English acceptably, stayed behind within their comfort zone. The time came when more of their people lived outside of the community than inside. They were ever more assimilated culturally into the mainstream. This is a typical American story.

But now we face a strong push to forego assimilation in favor of promoting the culture of the immigrants as not only equal, but deserving of local, state, and national government support.
This support comes in many guises: Affording multiple language tracks in schools; printing all government documents in multiple languages; allowing street signs to be given in several languages; and even reworking road signs for the foreign-born to understand ( this fact is useful, of course, to support tourism). Courts have been forced to employ translators to ensure that foreigners (even those who have been resident in the US for 20 years!) have access to the proceedings in their own language. Soon we might have Bastille Day, Cinco de Mayo, and something from many other lands to celebrate their unique cultural contributions to the world, but here in the US because of the concentration of their ex-homelanders in America.

Then will come the renaming pushes within their areas of concentration, and the erasure of the former US territory signs and symbols. Mexicalifornia comes to mind, remembering the book by Victor Davis Hanson. Our uniquely American identity will be scrambled together with asian, latino, and muslim identities in a most displeasing manner, first, because their cultures are simply not American, their attitudes have not been assimilated, and their value systems have not been modified to fit into American values.

Their moral compasses are not pointing to our North. So they act as they would if in their own land, or as they would if in a foreign land they do not respect enough to learn how to assimilate. Finally, their respect for the law in America may well be lacking to say the least. This is the road to disaster. One can see this clearly from the fact that 40% of the prison inmates in California are illegal immigrants. I do not believe in Open Borders.

Assimilation is coupled with the illegal immigration problem very strongly, where we have now some 11 million Mexicans roaming the country without the legal right to be here, and with no intent to conform to our way of life any more than necessary. The solutions being proposed for this part of the problem must include damming up the borders, severely punishing the businessmen who hire illegals, empowering local and state police to deal with illegals, and deporting wholesale all of the illegals we can find.

Amnesty is not a solution. Perhaps an effective sponsorship program can be worked out where businesses put up large bonds on each foreign worker hired to ensure return to the worker's own country when the work is finished. The size of the bond should be 20 times the actual wage paid or higher, thus potentially bankrupting the business if too many foreign employees skip out and disappear into the underground.

The official language for the US should be English, full stop. For legal immigrants, they should learn English within one to two years, and learn the basics of American history and culture, or be inelligible for citizenship. It should be the law that foreigners immigrate legally, and make every effort to assimilate, or be denied US citizenship. In some cases, they should be deported as well, especially those who break our laws.


Comments:
Have you ever heard of secularism? That's what they use in France, they ask people to be first french before they feel muslim or anything else; but in order to do that, you can't do it without social measure. Whether it works or not, that's what the model that the Bush administration wants to use; it is the only way how they assimilate them to their population, and it helps to slow down racism or violence. It cannot be achieved without urbanization either. ... etc


I've seen a lot of foreigners after 1 year in France that were able to speak the language and they do share their credo now. In the US since I've been living here, it's completely different: you have to learn everything by yourself (language, history, ...etc), the role of the State is completely not present at all. Otherwise I do not see any difference at all culturally compared to Europe or I've got used to it without really noticing it. But I don't know, when I travel and go to foreign countries, I do not want to keep my culture but more willing to adapt myself to learn from their traditions.
 
Indeed I have heard of secularism, particularly when applied to the separation of church and state. We have a certain form of secularism in the US, where the state is not permitted to establish a national religion.

However, the US was founded on the principles and moral teachings of Christianity, and we believe that our system of laws is grounded in the earlier Mosaic laws as taught in the Bible, and extended by English Common Law, the Constitution and subsequent decisions of courts.

A foreigner has resources from the US government to help learn the history,language, and customs of the US if they ask for them with the intent of becoming a citizen. Any INS Office, Post Office or City Hall has this information and guidance, I believe. So do selected government websites.

Americans are asked to pledge their allegience to the US and to the Constitution, under God. Thus, citizens have a dual allegience: to their God or non-God, and to the US.

This has seldom been a conflict, until challenged by a religious belief that includes the right and duty to kill "infidels", which is kind of against the law here, and is rather frowned upon in polite society.

The same is true of far-right Christian exteremists, such as the Dominionists, who pursue pure theism. This is also very "frowned upon" by the large majority of Americans and would be equally resisted!

Come to think of it, 9/11 was a perfect example of how much we frown on such behavior. We reacted!

Your idea that Bush wants to do something different from our usual path to assimilation does not accord with what I know.

The only remotely similar idea I have seen from Bush is the concept of instituting or reestablishing a work program for Mexicans (and others, I guess) so that they can come into the US, work, and go home legally, as opposed to illegally.

It is still the case that legal immigrants must be sponsored, have enough money to last them 90 days, have work to go to, and have a return ticket in case they want to back out. They have perhaps seven years before they can apply for citizenship, must take a written test for competence in English and American History, and then they can be sworn in.

However, there are other cases of being allowed into the US on special conditions, but for those I am not aware.

If you mean secular humanism, then I also know about that movement in some detail, and object to it very strongly. I have read all of the Humanist Manifestos, and they give me heartburn! I would resist strongly here too!

After my ten years in Holland, I was rather jaded by their whole scene, as was my wife. We objected very much to some of the anti-Americanism we encountered, especially the outright lies propagated through the leftists, and in the MSM. Perhaps what they know about America comes from movies and TV, which is a huge distortion factor.

Someone in the town we lived in made up a story about one of my daughters -- that she was an American Indian princess and was about to be sent home by me to marry an American Indian prince against her will! We had a great laugh about that, until in all seriousness one of my coworkers wives ask me if it was true. Strange people!
 

Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?